Skip to content
Industry

Five African Films Are Looking for Their Final Money in Venice. The Prize List Shows Exactly Where Independent Cinema Runs Out of Cash

Five African works in progress are seeking completion support at Venice. The available prizes reveal the hidden costs between a rough cut and a releasable film.

By Rotimi Fash 3 min read
Five African Films Are Looking for Their Final Money in Venice. The Prize List Shows Exactly Where Independent Cinema Runs Out of Cash

Five African projects are screening as unfinished films in Venice this week. Their problem is not whether they can be imagined or shot. It is whether they can afford to become deliverable movies.

Final Cut in Venice is presenting A Quarter to Thursday by Algeria’s Sofia Djama, Eldorado, the Taste of the South by Morocco’s Alaa Eddine Aljem, Madi Makambu by Congolese filmmaker Machérie Ekwa Bahango, Mehal Sefari by Ethiopia’s Abraham Gezahagne and Plague by Tunisia’s Youssef Chebbi. A sixth project comes from Jordan and Palestine.

The screenings run from 6 to 7 September, followed by meetings with buyers, distributors, programmers and post-production companies on 8 September.

The prizes describe the financing gap

Final Cut’s offers include €15,000 for colour correction, €15,000 for sound mixing, services valued at up to €10,000 for music, €10,000 for visual effects, DCP creation, subtitles, accessibility materials, cloud storage and several cash awards.

This is a map of the expenses that arrive after a producer has apparently “made” a film. A rough cut may contain the performances and story, yet still lack finished sound, colour, music licences, subtitles, masters and delivery files. Without those elements, a buyer cannot release it and a festival may not screen it properly.

The prize list also reveals how fragmented finishing finance has become. One company supplies grading, another sound, another a DCP and another subtitles. Producers assemble the final film through services spread across borders because few have enough unrestricted cash to pay for completion directly.

These are not cosmetic extras. A film without a properly mixed soundtrack can fail a broadcaster’s technical review. A project without accurate subtitles loses programmers and buyers. A master that does not meet platform specifications can sit under contract while the producer spends money correcting it. Completion finance is distribution finance because the film cannot enter the market without it.

The amounts are also revealing. Several awards fall between €2,500 and €15,000. Compared with a feature budget, each may look small. At the end of production, when contingency has been spent and investors believe the film is finished, that final amount can be the hardest money to raise.

Co-production is both solution and evidence

Every African project in the selection is an international co-production. The countries attached include France, Belgium, Italy, Norway, Canada, Germany, the Netherlands and Saudi Arabia.

These partnerships provide finance and technical access. They also show how rarely an ambitious African independent feature can be completed from one national system. The producer must become a diplomat of funds, treaties, labs and deadlines before the film becomes a market object.

The meeting may matter more than the award

A €5,000 grant can close a specific hole. A minimum guarantee or distribution commitment can change the film’s entire path. Final Cut offers an Arabic project a possible worldwide distribution minimum guarantee through MAD Solutions, while Rai Cinema offers €5,000 for a first negotiation right for Italian free-TV rights.

Producers should examine the rights attached to every apparently free service. A finishing award is most valuable when it completes the film without quietly limiting future territory, format or negotiating options.

The projects will not leave Venice on equal terms. Arabic-language films can qualify for some awards that the Congolese or Ethiopian projects cannot. Francophone eligibility creates another route. Genre, nationality and existing sales representation affect which support is useful. The programme is a marketplace, not a neutral rescue operation.

That is why the third day matters. A producer may gain more from one serious conversation with a distributor who understands the film than from a collection of services that finish it without creating a release. Completion is necessary, but a finished film without a buyer simply moves the financing problem to marketing.

Venice has gathered five African films at the exact point where artistic achievement meets industrial weakness. Their presence is hopeful. The list of unfinished tasks explains why hope still needs an invoice.

Source

Share this story

WhatsApp Post on X LinkedIn

About the Author

Rotimi Fash

Roll Call Africa staff contributor.